![]() ![]() It seems quite possible that our whole concept of personhood is inextricably bound up with this condition. Moreover, surely it's relevant that all persons of which we have direct experience are embodied, finite beings. ![]() ![]() I wonder if Swinburne is squaring the circle a bit here. **all-knowing but, Swinburne adds, god cannot know the outcome of our own free choices before we make them god gives us our free will and the power to use and by doing so thus makes him(/her?)self ignorant at least in this one area On Swinburne's account, the whole platonic paraphernalia of abstract objects then stands mysteriously apart from god god can explain the origins of consciousness, life, and the physical universe, but not (it seems) such things as math and logic * all-powerful but subject to the rules of logic god cannot do logically absurd things for instance, cannot make 1 + 1 equal anything other than 2. What kind of person is god? disembodied, infinitely good, all-powerful*, all-knowing** Theism - the thesis that there is such a person as God, and this person is the creator of the universe ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |